Very design

There are people who tend to refer to certain furniture or buildings or household objects as "design" as if to emphasize that such furniture, buildings or household objects have aesthetic characteristics that make them "modern". Modernity and design are not synonymous.

illustration: luis echánove

Normally, everything that surrounds us has needed to be drawn, that is, designed, prior to its production. From a pencil to a space rocket, it is necessary to design it before.

Design should not be understood as a purely aesthetic exercise. This would lead us to evaluate the results only from a subjective point of view. Objects are designed to fulfill a purpose. If to this we add that aesthetically they are at least acceptable, we will be adding value to the piece. What makes a design achieve excellence is therefore neither exclusively that it fulfills its purpose correctly, nor that it is "beautiful" or attractive to the majority, but a combination of both variables, plus other factors related to economic issues.

The reason why the expression "design" is identified with "modern" could lie in the fact that excessive importance has been given to this phase of the process, when, although it is indeed relevant, it is not predominant over functionality or production cost.

Historically, the pieces whose design has proved to be the most enduring and have been signified as truly excellent have often turned out to be works with apparently no design at all.

Thus, we can safely say that nothing is "very designy" because everything is designy.

Previous
Previous

Imitation of life

Next
Next

Designing garbage